<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Mad Money Machine &#187; Predictions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://MadMoneyMachine.com/category/predictions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://MadMoneyMachine.com</link>
	<description>BEST BUSINESS PODCAST NOMINEE 2006 and 2007. Paul Douglas Boyer takes on Wall Street with complete laziness and reviews the Mad Money recommendations of Jim Cramer. Plus: Money-making idea segments like Guru Roulette, Tools in the Crib, and Portfolio Smackdown. Subscribe to get the lastest episodes! More info at MadMoneyMachine.com.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:11:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<!-- podcast_generator="podPress/8.8" -->
		<copyright>&#xA9;Paul Boyer, MadMoneyMachine.com </copyright>
		<managingEditor>feedback@MadMoneyMachine.com (Paul Boyer, MadMoneyMachine.com)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>feedback@MadMoneyMachine.com(Paul Boyer, MadMoneyMachine.com)</webMaster>
		<category>Investing</category>
		<ttl>1440</ttl>
		<itunes:keywords>Investing, Cramer, money, business, finance, investor, wall street, CNBC, stocks, economy, humor</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>PODCAST AWARDS NOMINEE 2006 2007 2008. Paul Boyer takes on Wall Street and the battle for your Financial Freedom. Sometimes reviews Jim Cramer picks. Plus: Money-making idea segments like Guru Roulette, Tools in the Crib, and Lazy Portfolio Smackdown. Subscribe to get the latest episodes! More info at MadMoneyMachine.com.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Paul Boyer, MadMoneyMachine.com</itunes:author>
		<itunes:category text="Business">
  <itunes:category text="Investing"/>
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Business"/>
		<itunes:owner>
			<itunes:name>Paul Boyer, MadMoneyMachine.com</itunes:name>
			<itunes:email>feedback@MadMoneyMachine.com</itunes:email>
		</itunes:owner>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:image href="http://madmoneymachine.com/images/MMM-LogoPB.jpg" />
		
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s iPad!</title>
		<link>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2010/01/27/its-ipad/</link>
		<comments>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2010/01/27/its-ipad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Douglas Boyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2010/01/27/its-ipad/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a quick post to review the predictions I made and how well they turned out. Name: iPad (Ding!) Size: 9.7&#8243; (Ding! I said 10&#8243;) Form Factor: Basically a large iPod Touch (Ding!) Home Button? (Ding!) Aluminum back? (Ding!) Buttons and holes: headphone (Ding), microphone (Ding), volume (Ding), mute (Ding), sleep (Ding) USB port? (Bzzzt!) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick post to review the <a href="http://madmoneymachine.com/2010/01/12/time-to-talk-tablet-itablet-islate-ibook-ipad/">predictions I made</a> and how well they turned out.</p>
<ul>
<li>Name: iPad (Ding!)</li>
<li>Size: 9.7&#8243; (Ding! I said 10&#8243;)</li>
<li>Form Factor: Basically a large iPod Touch (Ding!)</li>
<li>Home Button? (Ding!)</li>
<li>Aluminum back? (Ding!)</li>
<li>Buttons and holes: headphone (Ding), microphone (Ding), volume (Ding), mute (Ding), sleep (Ding)</li>
<li>USB port? (Bzzzt!) Only has Apple dock. But that serves to connect to your computer. And it does have adapters for cameras.</li>
<li>Orientation: (Ding! Both portrait and landscape)</li>
<li>WiFi (Ding)</li>
<li>Internet connectivity: (Ding? 3G is optional. Nice surprise that it is easy to get 250MB/mo for $14.95)</li>
<li>Won&#8217;t have a phone (Ding!)</li>
<li>Software: (&#8220;It will be like an iPhone with some iWork apps available for download&#8221; DING! DING!) It actually runs iPhone apps like I expected.</li>
<li>Books: (&#8220;They will probably start selling books through iTunes.&#8221; DING! DING!)</li>
<li>GPS and big maps (DING!)</li>
<li>Cameras: (BZZZZZT!) Not three, not two, not even one camera. Maybe version 2?</li>
<li>Cost? I said $899 dropping to $699. I assumed it would have a 3G card installed. Their price for 3G? $629 to $829. Plus you want to buy the keyboard, case, and adapters. So I give myself a DING! for the price as well.</li>
</ul>
<p>So I think I got most everything right. Big misses on cameras and USB port. Bottom line is that the iPad is pretty much exactly what I pictured it to be in my mind. I will own one (or more).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2010/01/27/its-ipad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time To Talk Tablet: iTablet, iSlate, iBook, iPad</title>
		<link>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2010/01/12/time-to-talk-tablet-itablet-islate-ibook-ipad/</link>
		<comments>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2010/01/12/time-to-talk-tablet-itablet-islate-ibook-ipad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 03:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Douglas Boyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MadMoneyMachine.com/?p=1676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Take your pick of names but we are all awaiting the next holy product to be announced from Apple. After “The Jesus Phone” which had people literally weeping in their seats upon its unveiling, the Apple Table is set to be the next  revolutionary gadget that we didn’t realize we couldn’t live without. I have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take your pick of names but we are all awaiting the next holy product to be announced from Apple. After “The Jesus Phone” which had people literally weeping in their seats upon its unveiling, the Apple Table is set to be the next  revolutionary gadget that we didn’t realize we couldn’t live without. <img style="float: right;" title="Apple iPad?" src="http://MadMoneyMachine.com/images/mac_tablet_mockup_001_perspective.jpg" alt="Apple iPad?" width="200" height="136" /></p>
<p>I have a small window of time before the official announcement is made before which I can make my own predictions, wish lists, and observations about the new miracle device. Apple is expected to announce it on January 27th at a media event. I guess there is not enough time for them to get all my wish list items incorporated into the thing, but at least they will have my wish list for their 2nd generation of it by 2011.</p>
<p>First, my preferred name for the thing is the Apple iPad. I like the way it rhymes with iPod and it is alliterative with iPhone as well. iSlate is my 2nd choice just because it sounds cool. iBook would be my 3rd choice as it would fit into the MacBook line nicely, but iBook places too much emphasis on this thing being just an eReader and not enough on the other things I want it to do. Read on. iTablet? Sounds like something Dell would call it.</p>
<p>Form factor. The iPad will have the 10” screen everyone is expecting and will basically be a “Honey I Blew Up the iPhone” looking thing. A home button at the bottom and that’s all you see physically. Aluminum back, buttons and holes along the edges. Nice places to put your fingers as you hold it in portrait or landscape orientation.</p>
<p>Buttons and holes will include those found on the iPhone: Headphone/microphone jack, volume buttons, mute switch, sleep button. But it will also include USB. The BIG question is will it include a power hole or a iPod dock hole? You see, it makes a difference in deciding if the iPad will SYNC with a computer or will BE a computer. Will your iTunes library still be on your MacBook and you have to sync it with the iPad, or will the iPad have enough storage to hold all your music by itself? My guess: it will BE a computer and can run iTunes on its own. It could still share music with your MacBook with that family sharing  route and it could share photos and files and so forth. So my money is on it having a nice magnetic power adapter with all kinds of neat accessories we can buy like a car charger and external battery. PLEASE let me use the same magnetic adapter as my MacBook. My guess: they won’t! (They make TONS of money on those things!) And make some kind of adapter that lets me plug it into all my various iPod connectors in the car and external speakers.</p>
<p>The USB adapter will allow commonly needed connections like cameras, flips, and, wait for it… iPhones! And yes, i want to be able to charge my iPhone from the battery of my iPad. You won’t need USB for the external keyboard and mouse because those will connect via BlueTooth. And while you are typing and mousing on your iPad, you will need it to somehow stand up, won’t you? So I’m wondering if this thing will have some sort of picture-frame-like stand on its back that lets you sit it on a desk or table either in portrait or landscape orientation.</p>
<p>I keep harping on orientation. For me this is key to the iPad: being able to read books and long pdfs on it in portrait mode. Already it is more useful than a MacBook for that reason alone. I find reading books in landscape to be too small a window into the text. I don’t know how many others are like me, but the first thing I do on a new computer is move all of those dock or taskbar things from the bottom of the screen over to the left side. That gives me a little more reading room on my MacBook. And I try to trim menu bars and status bars away as well. With the iPad in portrait mode I will be in reading heaven even on a smaller 10” screen.</p>
<p>How will this thing get on the Internet is a key question. Of course it will have Wi-Fi. But will it be on the 3G and EDGE networks as well? Will I have to buy more service from ATT Wireless? Will it tether through my iPhone? Will the iPad BE a phone? My hopes are that it will BE a phone that uses the same phone number as my iPhone, that I can talk on either one, that I can switch between one and the other during a call, that I can surf the net on the iPad while talking on the iPhone, that it can let me make and receive calls with my BlueTooth headset, and that it can act perfectly well as a desktop speakerphone. Not too much to ask, right? If iPhone was the “Jesus Phone” then what would this iPad be, the “GOD” phone?</p>
<p>But my guess of what will actually happen is more limited. I think for this first release it will have Wi-Fi and 3G and EDGE DATA networking only. You will have to add some sort of appendage to your ATT Wireless iPhone plan to get remote internet on the thing. No calls, talking is for iPhones and that is the way we say it will be, says Apple. Maybe in a later release they can figure out if it makes sense to add a phone or not. Perhaps too many people will end up using the data plan to make Skype calls and they will come around.</p>
<p>What about software? Is the iPad a small MacBook or a big iPhone? Wow, this is a tougher one to call. I can make a good case for both. You want to be able to run iWork on the thing, right? But yet Apple wants you to buy 10 billion apps for the thing too. So like a flash it hits me: it runs MacOS but with an iPhone mode so you can do BOTH. But the iPhone OS is all about limiting what you can do. Will Apple want to limit what you can do in the iPad? If so, it will be more like an iPhone with some iWork apps available for download. Actually in that case they will probably throw in some iWork apps for free but you gotta buy all the other cool stuff.</p>
<p>How will you use this thing if you already have a MacBook and an iPhone like I do? You will have your iPhone in your pocket, your MacBook on your desk, and your iPad in your hands. On the couch, in a seat, or in bed. This is the “media comes to me” device. Read a book? Sure, the iPhone already has the Kindle app from Amazon so you can buy thousands of books for $9.99 and start reading. Knowing Apple, they will probably start selling books through the iTunes store. Don’t wanna miss a market, right? But I better be able to get pdfs onto this thing easily and freely or it goes in the trash.</p>
<p>You will also of course watch movies, listen to music, surf the net, and make blog postings. Standard fare. It is the book reading thing that makes the iPad so special. And of course it will be the first successful touch screen computer from Apple. The iPhone set the stage, but now we will have pinch and zoom super-sized. We’ll be using our arms more to see those details from the satellite view. Ah yes, GPS. Big maps finally. Would this thing be appropriate on the dashboard? Not unless it has a camera that can show what is in FRONT of the car! And speaking of cameras, it needs at least two: One on back like normal on the iPhone for taking vids of others and one on front for taking vid of you. Maybe one on the side just to be sly. And I’d really love it if the one on the front is actually UNDER the center of the screen, invisible to us but fully able to see us nonetheless. That way on video calls people will be looking AT YOU instead of somewhere off into space.</p>
<p>Finally, the dreaded question: How much will they want for this thing? Remember when the Jesus Phone first came out how much they charged? Same deal here, waayy more than what we want to pay. They will really put it to those early-adopter guys, hahaha! I expect that early price to be $899. Gasp! With netbooks retailing for $399! Yep, but it will drop after a few months to $699 and everybody will be like, “Whew, now I can afford one at last.”</p>
<p>So prepare for the iPad invasion. Prepare for the weeping, shaking bodies to behold not the iTablet being brought down from the mountain but the iPad being unveiled on Steve’s stage. I can’t wait.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2010/01/12/time-to-talk-tablet-itablet-islate-ibook-ipad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Investments for Inflationary Times (to Come?)</title>
		<link>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2009/02/19/investments-for-inflationary-times-to-come/</link>
		<comments>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2009/02/19/investments-for-inflationary-times-to-come/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Douglas Boyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portfolio Smackdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MadMoneyMachine.com/?p=1448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Austrian economists anticipated the present crisis. Should we listen to them when it comes to their predictions about what comes next? In one voice they are saying we will experience inflation unlike we&#8217;ve seen in the USA in over 100 years. Inflation is defined as the increase in the supply of money and credit. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Austrian economists anticipated the present crisis. Should we listen to them when it comes to their predictions about what comes next? In one voice they are saying we will experience inflation unlike we&#8217;ve seen in the USA in over 100 years. Inflation is defined as the increase in the supply of money and credit. We are certainly experiencing an increase in the supply of money at present. But the draw-down of credit is counter-acting the monetary inflation and we are hovering in inflationary stasis at present.</p>
<p>Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/02/bernankes_speech_on_easing_cre.html" target="_blank">said</a> the same thing on February 18th:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Some observers have expressed the concern that, by expanding its balance sheet, the Federal Reserve will ultimately stoke inflation. The Fed&#8217;s lending activities have indeed resulted in a large increase in the reserves held by banks and thus in the narrowest definition of the money supply, the monetary base. However, banks are choosing to leave the great bulk of their excess reserves idle, in most cases on deposit with the Fed. Consequently, the rates of growth of broader monetary aggregates, such as M1 and M2, have been much lower than that of the monetary base. At this point, with global economic activity weak and commodity prices at low levels, we see little risk of unacceptably high inflation in the near term; indeed, we expect inflation to be quite low for some time.</p>
<p>He acknowledged that they are inflating. But he threw a red herring into the mix by talking about weak economic activity and low commodity prices (Heh, except gold, right Ben?) trying to infer that they are somehow the cause of inflation. No, they are the result of inflation. Next, he went into how they will correct their inflation:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">However, at some point, when credit markets and the economy have begun to recover, the Federal Reserve will have to moderate growth in the money supply and begin to raise the federal funds rate. To reduce policy accommodation, the Fed will have to unwind some of its credit-easing programs and allow its balance sheet to shrink. &#8230; However, the principal factor determining the timing and pace of that process will be the Federal Reserve&#8217;s assessment of the condition of credit markets and the prospects for the economy.</p>
<p>Bernanke recognized that the plane is in a nosedive and at the last minute he plans to push on the stick and go airborne again. I hope it is not a cloudy day when he has to judge how far the plane is from the ground. He wrapped up his thoughts on inflation and how to avoid it:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">As we consider new programs or the expansion of old ones, the Federal Reserve will carefully weigh the implications for the exit strategy. And we will take all necessary actions to ensure that the unwinding of our programs is accomplished smoothly and in a timely way, consistent with meeting our obligation to foster maximum employment and price stability.</p>
<p>What do *you* think the chances are that the Fed will get all of the necessary actions right? Have they gotten the necessary actions right up to this point? Let us examine a scenario where they are not able to get it right and we do indeed experience undesirable inflation, which I will define to be anything above 5% annually.</p>
<p>How might the various asset classes be affected in times of inflation? To answer this question, I utilized <a href="http://www.bogleheads.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=403843" target="_blank">Simba</a> &#8216;s spreadsheet for back-testing portfolios (which I imported into Google Spreadsheets) to do a correlation between CPI (Consumer Price Index, the government&#8217;s official inflation number) and various stock fund, bond fund, and gold returns. The data in the spreadsheet uses annual returns of Vanguard index funds along with the yearly closing price of gold from the years 1971 &#8211; 2008.  The spreadsheet already calculated the cross-correlation between each of the mutual funds and it lists the annual CPI index. So it was very easy to drop the CPI into one of the mutual fund slots and instantly see the correlation between every asset class and inflation. Here are the results, sorted by correlation:</p>
<table id="tblMain_0" class="tblGenFixed" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="hd">
</td>
<td class="s0"><strong>Asset Class</strong></td>
<td class="s1"><strong>Ticker</strong></td>
<td class="s1"><strong>Correlation</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="hd">
</td>
<td class="s2">T-BILL (money mkt)</td>
<td class="s3">VMPXX</td>
<td class="s4">0.63</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="hd">
</td>
<td class="s2">GOLD</td>
<td class="s3">GOLD</td>
<td class="s4">0.52</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="hd">
</td>
<td class="s2">Long Term Govt Bnd</td>
<td class="s3">VUSTX</td>
<td class="s4">-0.40</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="hd">
</td>
<td class="s2">Short Term Trsry</td>
<td class="s3">VFISX</td>
<td class="s4">0.28</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="hd">
</td>
<td class="s2">Commodities</td>
<td class="s3">PCRIX</td>
<td class="s4">0.25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="hd">
</td>
<td class="s2">5 Yr T</td>
<td class="s3">VFITX</td>
<td class="s4">-0.24</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="hd">
</td>
<td class="s2">Wellesley Fund</td>
<td class="s3">VWINX</td>
<td class="s4">-0.21</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="hd">
</td>
<td class="s2">Wellington Fund</td>
<td class="s3">VWELX</td>
<td class="s4">-0.16</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="hd">
</td>
<td class="s2">Small Cap Grwth</td>
<td class="s3">VISGX</td>
<td class="s4">0.13</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="hd">
</td>
<td class="s2">Total Bond</td>
<td class="s3">VBMFX</td>
<td class="s4">-0.12</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="hd">
</td>
<td class="s2">Small Cap</td>
<td class="s3">NAESX</td>
<td class="s4">0.11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="hd">
</td>
<td class="s2">EAFE Dev</td>
<td class="s3">VDMIX</td>
<td class="s4">-0.10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="hd">
</td>
<td class="s2">Europe</td>
<td class="s3">VEURX</td>
<td class="s4">-0.10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="hd">
</td>
<td class="s2">Intl Value</td>
<td class="s3">VTRIX</td>
<td class="s4">-0.10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="hd">
</td>
<td class="s2">EAFE85/EM15</td>
<td class="s3">EAFE/EM</td>
<td class="s4">-0.09</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="hd">
</td>
<td class="s2">500 Idx</td>
<td class="s3">VFINX</td>
<td class="s4">-0.09</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="hd">
</td>
<td class="s2">Large Cap Grwth</td>
<td class="s3">VIGRX</td>
<td class="s4">-0.07</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="hd">
</td>
<td class="s2">Total Market US</td>
<td class="s3">VTSMX</td>
<td class="s4">-0.06</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="hd">
</td>
<td class="s2">Simulated TIPS</td>
<td class="s3">S-TIPS</td>
<td class="s4">0.06</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="hd">
</td>
<td class="s2">Pacific</td>
<td class="s3">VPACX</td>
<td class="s4">-0.06</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="hd">
</td>
<td class="s2">Emerg Mkts</td>
<td class="s3">VEIEX</td>
<td class="s4">-0.06</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="hd">
</td>
<td class="s2">Large Cap Value</td>
<td class="s3">VIVAX</td>
<td class="s4">-0.04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="hd">
</td>
<td class="s2">Small Cap Value</td>
<td class="s3">VISVX</td>
<td class="s4">0.04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="hd">
</td>
<td class="s2">REIT</td>
<td class="s3">VGSIX</td>
<td class="s4">-0.01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="hd">
</td>
<td class="s2">Windsor Fund</td>
<td class="s3">VWNDX</td>
<td class="s4">-0.01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="hd">
</td>
<td class="s2">Mid Cap</td>
<td class="s3">VIMSX</td>
<td class="s4">-0.01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="hd">
</td>
<td class="s2">Micro Cap</td>
<td class="s3">BRSIX</td>
<td class="s4">0.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The table shows those asset classes that were most closely correlated with the CPI at the top. Note in the third column that a value of 1 would mean the asset is perfectly correlated, -1 would mean perfectly correlated inversely (it went down exactly as CPI went up), and 0 means there was no correlation: it was random.</p>
<p>So we see that those assets that were most highly correlated with CPI were T-bills, gold, long-term government bonds (inversely), short-term Treasuries, and commodities.  Everything else was below 0.25 correlation. Interestingly, micro cap stocks were totally uncorrelated with inflation.</p>
<p>So how did a portfolio of those assets perform during the years 1973-1981 in which CPI was 8.7, 12.3, 6.9, 4.9, 6.7, 9, 13.3, 12.5, and 8.9%?</p>
<p>I constructed a portfolio along the lines of the Harry Browne <a href="crawlingroad.com/blog" target="_blank">Permanent Portfolio</a> (HBPP invests 25% each into total US stock market, long-term bonds, money market, and gold) but I added some small cap value, micro cap, and eliminated the long-term bond fund. I then back-tested that portfolio during those inflation years. Here is the portfolio what I came up with:</p>
<p><strong>The Inflation Portfolio:</strong></p>
<p>VISVX (Small Cap Value) 15%<br />
BRSIX (Micro Cap) 15%<br />
PCRIX (Commodities) 10%<br />
VMPXX (Money Market) 45%<br />
Gold 15%</p>
<p>The &quot;Inflation Portfolio&quot; had a CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate) of 15.5% and a risk (as measured by standard deviation) of 10.5%. Plotting that on a chart, here&#8217;s what it looks like compared with some other portfolios and the assets themselves:</p>
<p><img src="http://MadMoneyMachine.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/picture-8.png" alt="Inflation Portfolio Return vs. Risk" width="450" height="318" /></p>
<p>The chart shows plots for various portfolios during those inflation years. The plot point directly above HBPP simply substituted BRSIX for VTSMX in the HBPP. The major components of the Inflation Portfolio are also plotted separately showing how volatile gold and BRSIX were themselves. When tempered together with VMPXX, the risk came down considerably while retaining significant returns. You can see all of the rest of the details in the Google <a href="https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=pOjc3ot10vguOi--yyFRSFA&amp;hl=en&amp;newcopy" target="_blank">spreadsheet</a> that I created for this scenario and you can test out other hypotheses yourself.</p>
<p>The Inflation Portfolio worked from 1973 through 1981. If we see inflation return, would it work again? Some folks are <a href="http://www.bogleheads.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=404768#404768" target="_blank">discussing</a> these findings at the Bogleheads forum if you want to chime in.</p>
<p>Please note this is not a recommendation to invest your net worth in the Inflation Portfolio!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2009/02/19/investments-for-inflationary-times-to-come/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two Years of Decline Packed Into Five Months</title>
		<link>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/10/15/two-years-of-decline-packed-into-five-months/</link>
		<comments>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/10/15/two-years-of-decline-packed-into-five-months/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Douglas Boyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predictions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MadMoneyMachine.com/?p=921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a follow-up to my posting from last May called &#8220;Technical Analysis and Trend Following&#8221; where I compared the S&#38;P 500&#8242;s decline from 2001-2003 to the movement from April 2006 to May 2008.  It was a thinly-veiled jab at those who were predicting a resumption of the bull market based upon a recent uptick [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a follow-up to my posting from last May called &#8220;<a href="http://madmoneymachine.com/2008/05/06/technical-analysis-and-trend-following/">Technical Analysis and Trend Following</a>&#8221; where I compared the S&amp;P 500&#8242;s decline from 2001-2003 to the movement from April 2006 to May 2008.  It was a thinly-veiled jab at those who were predicting a resumption of the bull market based upon a recent uptick in the market. I showed that there was an uptick in April 2001:</p>
<p><img src="http://MadMoneyMachine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/image.png" alt="" width="490" height="318" /></p>
<p>and anyone who bought at that time lost big as the index went from about 1300 in April 2001 down to 850 in 2003:</p>
<p><img src="http://MadMoneyMachine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/image1.png" alt="" width="485" height="316" /></p>
<p>Then I showed a chart that looked similar to the first chart, but this time one that was of the recent market from April 2006 to May 2008:</p>
<p><img src="http://MadMoneyMachine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/image2.png" alt="April 2006 to May 2008" width="484" height="314" /></p>
<p>This was a time when stock market pundits like Cramer and most of the talking heads on CNBC were saying the market was set to go much higher. Others who didn&#8217;t get mass media attention like Nouriel Roubini, Peter Schiff, Gary North, and Ron Paul were saying we were in big trouble.</p>
<p>Amazing how it worked out. Chart #2 above took two years to drop from 1300 to 850. This next chart took only five months, from May 2008 to October 2008, to drop the same amount. And yes, there was an intra-day low of 839.8 on October 10th.</p>
<p><img src="http://MadMoneyMachine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/sp500-may-oct-08.jpg" alt="S&amp;P 500 May - Oct 2008" width="354" height="248" /></p>
<p>If I were to show a chart from February 2003 to October 2007, it will look like the north slope of Mt. Everest. Oh heck, why don&#8217;t I go ahead and show it&#8230;</p>
<p><img src="http://MadMoneyMachine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/sp500-feb03-oct07.jpg" alt="Everest" width="347" height="240" /></p>
<p>Is that what the S&amp;P 500 will look like from October 2007 to 2011? Or will it be condensed into a space of five months like the recent deline was? Or will it be different this time?</p>
<p>I do not know where the market will bottom out. My sense of it is that the market will trade violently around the current level for the next few months, bouncing along this bottom. As earnings report come in lower, the P/E ratio of the market will adjust accordingly. I think there is more widespread bearishness today compared to May. But I think there are still a lot of bulls trying to buy the bottom. There is an epic battle between the bulls and bears which will continue until we see the light at the end of the economic crisis tunnel.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, I&#8217;m taking a look at dividend focused funds and will report on show 133.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/10/15/two-years-of-decline-packed-into-five-months/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another show to hear</title>
		<link>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/09/26/another-show-to-hear/</link>
		<comments>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/09/26/another-show-to-hear/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Douglas Boyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predictions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MadMoneyMachine.com/?p=825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter Schiff of Euro Pacific Capital does a weekly show (on shortwave radio or something, but anyway). The one he did on Wednesday the 24th is a must listen. He tells it like it is. For example, &#8220;It&#8217;s not the tax payers who are on the hook for any bailout: nobody is talking about raising [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter Schiff of Euro Pacific Capital does a weekly show (on shortwave radio or something, but anyway). The one he did on <a href="http://www.europac.net/radioshow_archives.asp">Wednesday the 24th</a> is a must listen. He tells it like it is. For example, &#8220;It&#8217;s not the tax payers who are on the hook for any bailout: nobody is talking about raising taxes. It is the dollar holders who will suffer through higher inflation&#8230;. The dollar is going to collapse.&#8221;</p>
<p>I cannot find a way to subscribe to his show through iTunes. So what I do is download the .mp3 file, import it into the music section of iTunes, then add it to a Playlist that gets it onto my iPhone. Of course you could always just listen on your computer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/09/26/another-show-to-hear/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cramer the Chameleon</title>
		<link>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/06/25/cramer-the-chameleon/</link>
		<comments>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/06/25/cramer-the-chameleon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Douglas Boyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predictions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/06/25/cramer-the-chameleon/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like a weathervane, Cramer points toward where the winds are blowing. Like a chameleon, Cramer adapts to the current environment. Like a stock picker, Cramer follows today&#8217;s trend and picks what worked. Like a cheetah, you should turn and run from his advice as fast as possible. Here&#8217;s why&#8230;   I&#8217;ve witnessed this flip-flopping so [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" src="http://madmoneymachine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/image3.png" border="0" alt="image" width="120" height="117" align="right" /> Like a weathervane, Cramer points toward where the winds are blowing.</p>
<p><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" src="http://madmoneymachine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/image4.png" border="0" alt="image" width="127" height="96" align="left" /> Like a chameleon, Cramer adapts to the current environment.</p>
<p>Like<img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" src="http://madmoneymachine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/image5.png" border="0" alt="image" width="128" height="97" align="right" /> a stock picker, Cramer follows today&#8217;s trend and picks what worked.</p>
<p><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" src="http://madmoneymachine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/image6.png" border="0" alt="image" width="154" height="117" align="left" /> Like a cheetah, you should turn and run from his advice as fast as possible.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s why&#8230;</p>
<p> </p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_nkZ3eHeXlc&amp;hl=en" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_nkZ3eHeXlc&amp;hl=en" wmode="transparent"></embed></object></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve witnessed this flip-flopping so many times, I&#8217;m just tired and weary of it. Please just take the <a href="http://www.ifa.com/surveynet/">Risk Capacity Survey</a>, select an appropriate portfolio of Index Funds, buy and hold them, and then invest and relax.</p>
<p>(via <a href="http://www.thekirkreport.com/2008/06/the-dirty-float.html">The Kirk Report</a> via <a href="http://www.crossingwallstreet.com/archives/2008/06/buy_buy_buy_wai.html">Crossing Wall Street</a> via <a href="http://www.portfolio.com/views/blogs/market-movers/">Felix</a> via <a href="http://www.donharrold.net/">Don Harrold</a> &#8211; can you believe that chain?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/06/25/cramer-the-chameleon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prediction #8 Realized: One-Stop-Shop ETF</title>
		<link>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/05/20/prediction-8-realized-one-stop-shop-etf/</link>
		<comments>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/05/20/prediction-8-realized-one-stop-shop-etf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 00:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Douglas Boyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Predictions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/05/20/prediction-8-realized-one-stop-shop-etf/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I made ten (really eleven) predictions on show MMM-092: Predicting the Future for 2008. Prediction #8 was: 8. A one-stop-shop ETF portfolio fund will appear that gives complete exposure to risk, reward, and diversification all for a low fee. It will include all of the SMILER components as well as some bonds, commodities, and even [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I made ten (really eleven) predictions on show <a href="http://madmoneymachine.com/2007/12/28/mmm-092/">MMM-092: Predicting the Future</a> for 2008. Prediction #8 was:</p>
<blockquote><p>8. A one-stop-shop ETF portfolio fund will appear that gives complete exposure to risk, reward, and diversification all for a low fee. It will include all of the SMILER components as well as some bonds, commodities, and even private equity and possibly even some selected shorts (A short of a bear fund, perhaps??) </p>
</blockquote>
<p><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="103" alt="MMM-092" src="http://madmoneymachine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/mmm-092.jpg" width="105" align="right" border="0"/>That prediction came true today as I learned from IndexUniverse.com that PowerShares announced three &#8220;<a href="http://www.indexuniverse.com/sections/breaking-news/10/4131-new-powershares-are-etfs-of-etfs.html">ETFs of ETFs</a>&#8220;, their so-called &#8220;<a href="http://www.invescopowershares.com/pdf/P-AUTO-PRO-1.pdf">Autonomic</a>&#8221; portfolios. All of the SMILER components (Small, Micro, International, Large, Emerging Market, and REIT) are in these plus some bonds and commodities. Even currencies, gold and oil funds are in these. These are the laziest possible portfolios; buy one ETF and you&#8217;re done! (Hmmm, maybe I&#8217;m not really recommending that. We&#8217;ll see&#8230;)</p>
<p>The funds are named &#8220;PowerShares Autonomic [style] NFA Global Asset Portfolio&#8221; where [style] is either Balanced (<a href="http://www.invescopowershares.com/pdf/P-PCA-PC-1.pdf">PCA</a>), Balanced Growth (<a href="http://www.invescopowershares.com/pdf/P-PAO-PC-1.pdf">PAO</a>) or Growth (<a href="http://www.invescopowershares.com/pdf/P-PTO-PC-1.pdf">PTO</a>).</p>
<p>The total expense ratios for each of these funds include the expenses of each of the component ETFs plus another layer of management fees and are 0.82% for PAO, 0.75% for PCA, and 0.86% for PTO. Yeah, you might be able to do it cheaper if you bought each of the ETFs yourself. Then again, maybe not with all the trading costs.</p>
<p>The table below shows the percentage of each of the ETFs that are included in each of the new ETFs.</p>
<table style="width: 354pt; border-collapse: collapse" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="469" border="0" x:str>
<colgroup>
<col style="width: 223pt; mso-width-source: userset; mso-width-alt: 10861" width="297"> </col>
<col style="width: 35pt; mso-width-source: userset; mso-width-alt: 1682" width="46"> </col>
<col style="width: 32pt; mso-width-source: userset; mso-width-alt: 1536" span="3" width="42">
<tbody>
<tr style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">
<td class="xl24" style="width: 223pt; height: 12.75pt" width="297" height="17"><strong>Name</strong></td>
<td class="xl24" style="width: 35pt" width="46"><strong>Ticker</strong></td>
<td class="xl24" style="width: 32pt" width="42"><strong>PTO</strong></td>
<td class="xl24" style="width: 32pt" width="42"><strong>PCA</strong></td>
<td class="xl24" style="width: 32pt" width="42"><strong>PAO</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">
<td style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">PowerShares Dynamic Developed Intl Optys</td>
<td>PFA</td>
<td align="right" x:num>22.18</td>
<td align="right" x:num>7.19</td>
<td align="right" x:num>14.69</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">
<td style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">PowerShares Dynamic Large Cap Portfolio</td>
<td>PJF</td>
<td align="right" x:num>13.03</td>
<td align="right" x:num>4.45</td>
<td align="right" x:num>8.92</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">
<td style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">PowerShares Dynamic Europe Portfolio</td>
<td>PEH</td>
<td align="right" x:num>7.78</td>
<td align="right" x:num>14.84</td>
<td align="right" x:num>13.67</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">
<td style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">PowerShares Dynamic Asia Pacific Optys</td>
<td>PUA</td>
<td align="right" x:num>4.62</td>
<td align="right" x:num>4.61</td>
<td align="right" x:num>4.62</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">
<td style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">Vanguard Emerging Markets ETF</td>
<td>VWO</td>
<td align="right" x:num>4.55</td>
<td align="right" x:num>3.89</td>
<td align="right" x:num>4.05</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">
<td style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">ISHARES MSCI E.M.I.F</td>
<td>EEM</td>
<td align="right" x:num>4.51</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td align="right" x:num>1.81</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">
<td style="height: 12.75pt" height="17" x:str="PowerShares Dynamic Large Cap Value ">PowerShares Dynamic Large Cap Value<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;</span></td>
<td>PWV</td>
<td align="right" x:num>4.47</td>
<td align="right" x:num>4.18</td>
<td align="right" x:num>4.31</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">
<td style="height: 12.75pt" height="17" x:str="PowerShares Dynamic Mid Cap Growth ">PowerShares Dynamic Mid Cap Growth<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;</span></td>
<td>PWJ</td>
<td align="right" x:num>4.38</td>
<td align="right" x:num>2.94</td>
<td align="right" x:num>3.74</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">
<td style="height: 12.75pt" height="17" x:str="PowerShares Dynamic Large Cap Growth ">PowerShares Dynamic Large Cap Growth<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;</span></td>
<td>PWB</td>
<td align="right" x:num>4</td>
<td align="right" x:num>4.16</td>
<td align="right" x:num>4.03</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">
<td style="height: 12.75pt" height="17" x:str="PowerShares Dynamic Small Cap Value ">PowerShares Dynamic Small Cap Value<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;</span></td>
<td>PWY</td>
<td align="right" x:num>3.51</td>
<td align="right" x:num>3.02</td>
<td align="right" x:num>3.45</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">
<td style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">Vanguard Europe Pacific ETF</td>
<td>VEA</td>
<td align="right" x:num>3.03</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">
<td style="height: 12.75pt" height="17" x:str="PowerShares Dynamic Small Cap Growth ">PowerShares Dynamic Small Cap Growth<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;</span></td>
<td>PWT</td>
<td align="right" x:num>2.86</td>
<td align="right" x:num>1.46</td>
<td align="right" x:num>1.94</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">
<td style="height: 12.75pt" height="17" x:str="PowerShares Dynamic Mid Cap Value ">PowerShares Dynamic Mid Cap Value<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;</span></td>
<td>PWP</td>
<td align="right" x:num>2.54</td>
<td align="right" x:num>2.21</td>
<td align="right" x:num>2.57</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">
<td style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">Vanguard REIT ETF</td>
<td>VNQ</td>
<td align="right" x:num>2.39</td>
<td align="right" x:num>3.11</td>
<td align="right" x:num>3.12</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">
<td style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">DJ Wilshire REIT ETF</td>
<td>RWR</td>
<td align="right" x:num>2.36</td>
<td align="right" x:num>3.08</td>
<td align="right" x:num>3.08</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">
<td style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">Vanguard European ETF</td>
<td>VGK</td>
<td align="right" x:num>2.02</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">
<td style="height: 12.75pt" height="17" x:str="PowerShares Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ">PowerShares Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;</span></td>
<td>PCY</td>
<td align="right" x:num>1.75</td>
<td align="right" x:num>2.78</td>
<td align="right" x:num>2.46</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">
<td style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">ISHARES GS Invest Grade Corp Bond</td>
<td>LQD</td>
<td align="right" x:num>1.52</td>
<td align="right" x:num>8.05</td>
<td align="right" x:num>4.4</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">
<td style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">PowerShares 1-30 Laddered Treasury Portfolio</td>
<td>PLW</td>
<td align="right" x:num>1.35</td>
<td align="right" x:num>4.51</td>
<td align="right" x:num>3.98</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">
<td style="height: 12.75pt" height="17" x:str="SPDR Lehman International Treasury Bond ">SPDR Lehman International Treasury Bond<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;</span></td>
<td>BWX</td>
<td align="right" x:num>1.29</td>
<td align="right" x:num>5.19</td>
<td align="right" x:num>4.01</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">
<td style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">PowerShares Zacks Micro Cap Portfolio</td>
<td>PZI</td>
<td align="right" x:num>1.25</td>
<td align="right" x:num>0.8</td>
<td align="right" x:num>0.97</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">
<td style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">iShares Lehman MBS Fixed-Rate Bond Fund</td>
<td>MBB</td>
<td align="right" x:num>0.92</td>
<td align="right" x:num>6.5</td>
<td align="right" x:num>2.69</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">
<td style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">ISHARES LEHMAN TIPS</td>
<td>TIP</td>
<td align="right" x:num>0.82</td>
<td align="right" x:num>3.57</td>
<td align="right" x:num>2.51</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">
<td style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">PowerShares DB Gold Fund</td>
<td>DGL</td>
<td align="right" x:num>0.54</td>
<td align="right" x:num>0.83</td>
<td align="right" x:num>0.75</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">
<td style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">POWERSHARES HYCB</td>
<td>PHB</td>
<td align="right" x:num>0.54</td>
<td align="right" x:num>1.77</td>
<td align="right" x:num>1.28</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">
<td style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">PowerShares DB G10 Currency Harvest Fund</td>
<td>DBV</td>
<td align="right" x:num>0.53</td>
<td align="right" x:num>1.28</td>
<td align="right" x:num>1.04</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">
<td style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">PowerShares Dynamic Mid Cap Portfolio</td>
<td>PJG</td>
<td align="right" x:num>0.5</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">
<td style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">PowerShares DB Oil Fund</td>
<td>DBO</td>
<td align="right" x:num>0.48</td>
<td align="right" x:num>0.64</td>
<td align="right" x:num>0.57</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">
<td style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">ISHARES LEHMAN 20 YR</td>
<td>TLT</td>
<td align="right" x:num>0.25</td>
<td align="right" x:num>1.33</td>
<td align="right" x:num>0.8</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">
<td style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">ISHARES LEHMAN 1-3YR</td>
<td>SHY</td>
<td align="right" x:num>0.05</td>
<td align="right" x:num>1.21</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 12.75pt" height="17">
<td style="height: 12.75pt" height="17" x:fmla="=MSNStockQuote(B32,&quot;Company Name&quot;,&quot;US&quot;)">ISHARESLEHMAN 7-10YR</td>
<td>IEF</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td align="right" x:num>2.38</td>
<td align="right" x:num>0.47</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</col>
</colgroup>
</table>
<p>I intend to track these funds to see how well they compare against our Lazy Portfolios. I may even try to backtest a portfolio of the individual ETFs to see how well it would have done in the past, including the average annualized returns and Sharpe Ratio. The problem will be that some of the ETFs themselves aren&#8217;t that old.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be talking about this on show 112 and letting you know more as I know more. This is fun. By my count, that is 4 down, <a href="http://madmoneymachine.com/2007/12/28/mmm-092/">6 to go</a>. (Predictions #3, 4, 5, and 8.) I still stand by the rest. And we&#8217;ll see if Apple announces a tablet PC on June 9th for prediction #2.</p>
<p>And since I&#8217;m here, have you noticed that Jim Cramer has been talking more about &#8220;portfolios&#8221; recently? His &#8220;Kevlar&#8221; and &#8220;Stability&#8221; portfolios come to mind. This makes prediction #1 even more likely. #7 is a slam dunk. And hey, for #9 there are more international stars in MLS this season too. Go Beckham!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/05/20/prediction-8-realized-one-stop-shop-etf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Technical Analysis and Trend Following</title>
		<link>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/05/06/technical-analysis-and-trend-following/</link>
		<comments>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/05/06/technical-analysis-and-trend-following/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 21:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Douglas Boyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Predictions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/05/06/technical-analysis-and-trend-following/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a question for you trend followers. You chart watchers. You technical traders. Have a look at this chart and tell me if it is time to buy or time to sell. Looks like the momentum is up on this baby right? Time to buy? Here&#8217;s how it worked out for you&#8230; The first [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question for you trend followers. You chart watchers. You technical traders. Have a look at this chart and tell me if it is time to buy or time to sell.</p>
<p><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="318" alt="image" src="http://madmoneymachine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/image.png" width="490" border="0" /> </p>
<p>Looks like the momentum is up on this baby right? Time to buy? Here&#8217;s how it worked out for you&#8230;</p>
<p><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="316" alt="image" src="http://madmoneymachine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/image1.png" width="485" border="0" /> </p>
<p>The first chart was from roughly May 1998 thru April 2001. The second chart was from about April 2001 thru March 2003. The trend definitely wasn&#8217;t your friend if you thought we had bottomed in April 2001 and were headed for nothing but up.</p>
<p>Now take a look at this chart:</p>
<p> <img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="314" alt="image" src="http://madmoneymachine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/image2.png" width="484" border="0" />  </p>
<p>Anything familiar-looking about this chart? Is it the same chart as the top one? </p>
<p>Nope. This chart is from April 2006 to present. For everyone who says we&#8217;ve seen the bottom. Revisit chart #2.</p>
<p>I wish I&#8217;d never seen a stock chart and I wish I didn&#8217;t have easy access to charts like I do now because I get sucked in to thinking that there must be patterns in prices like there are patterns in nature. I am always wrong when I think that. Studies have shown that there actually is *some* momentum, but I really don&#8217;t think anyone can consistently profit from it. Here&#8217;s a better chart if you must look at charts.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ifa.com/portfolios/PortReturnCalc/index.aspx?i=100&amp;s=1/1/1988&amp;e=3/1/2008&amp;type=folio&amp;g=1&amp;infl=False&amp;tax=False&amp;wort=0&amp;perc=False&amp;wortinf=False&amp;aorw=1#calc"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="357" alt="image" src="http://madmoneymachine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/image3.png" width="485" border="0" /></a> </p>
<p>Twenty years of Index Portfolio 100 from IFA.com. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m just sayin&#8217;. Set it and forget it. For twenty years!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/05/06/technical-analysis-and-trend-following/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jim Rogers: Abolish the Fed</title>
		<link>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/03/13/jim-rogers-abolish-the-fed/</link>
		<comments>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/03/13/jim-rogers-abolish-the-fed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Douglas Boyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Predictions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/03/13/jim-rogers-abolish-the-fed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here now for a self-fulfilling prediction: I said you&#8217;d be seeing more of Jim Rogers in 2008 as commodities and China take the headlines. Here now is Jim on CNBC the other day in an interesting (sometimes funny!) interview in which he says the Fed is doing a poor job, throwing gas on a raging [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here now for a self-fulfilling prediction: I said you&#8217;d be seeing more of Jim Rogers in 2008 as commodities and China take the headlines. Here now is Jim on CNBC the other day in an interesting (sometimes funny!) interview in which he says the Fed is doing a poor job, throwing gas on a raging fire. The other central banks around the world are doing much better. At least they *acknowledge* there is inflation. </p>
<div class="wlWriterSmartContent" id="scid:5737277B-5D6D-4f48-ABFC-DD9C333F4C5D:c483d18e-0e06-4a81-9927-065539e363e8" style="padding-right: 0px; display: inline; padding-left: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; margin: 0px; padding-top: 0px">
<div id="611fc4f0-75fc-4f3c-8ba8-91f28301e9e4" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; display: inline;">
<div><a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6046520409389956642" target="_new"><img src="http://madmoneymachine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/videoecf7e6900ccf.jpg" galleryimg="no" onload="var downlevelDiv = document.getElementById('611fc4f0-75fc-4f3c-8ba8-91f28301e9e4'); downlevelDiv.innerHTML = &quot;&lt;div&gt;&lt;embed style=\&quot;width:400px; height:326px;\&quot; id=\&quot;VideoPlayback\&quot; type=\&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash\&quot; src=\&quot;http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=-6046520409389956642&amp;hl=en\&quot; flashvars=\&quot;\&quot;&gt; &lt;\/embed&gt;&lt;\/div&gt;&quot;;" alt=""/></a></div>
</div>
</div>
<p>If you want to take his advice and buy agriculture and currencies, you may want to do some homework on DBA, FXY, FXF, and FXA. Possibly DBC as well. Oh, and SKF!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/03/13/jim-rogers-abolish-the-fed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prediction 5 (and its update) Realized</title>
		<link>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/03/13/prediction-5-and-its-update-realized/</link>
		<comments>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/03/13/prediction-5-and-its-update-realized/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Douglas Boyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Predictions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/03/13/prediction-5-and-its-update-realized/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gold reached $1000/oz today, as I predicted.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gold reached $1000/oz today, as I <a href="http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/01/02/that-was-easy-1-down-9-to-go/">predicted</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/03/13/prediction-5-and-its-update-realized/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where Do We Run When the Dark Clouds Come?</title>
		<link>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/03/11/where-do-we-run-when-the-dark-clouds-come/</link>
		<comments>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/03/11/where-do-we-run-when-the-dark-clouds-come/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 03:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Douglas Boyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Predictions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/03/11/where-do-we-run-when-the-dark-clouds-come/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A tag cloud is a visual depiction that identifies the frequently-used words of an information collection. A tag cloud for 2008 might include: Sub-prime. Meltdown. Credit-crisis. Foreclosure. Term-auction. Dollar-collapse. Asset-devaluation. Inflation. Deflation. Stagflation. Recession. Depression. It would be strikingly different from that of just one year ago. Back then we were talking earnings, iPhones, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tag_cloud">tag cloud</a> is a visual depiction that identifies the frequently-used words of an information collection. A tag cloud for 2008 might include: Sub-prime. Meltdown. Credit-crisis. Foreclosure. Term-auction. Dollar-collapse. Asset-devaluation. Inflation. Deflation. Stagflation. Recession. Depression. It would be strikingly different from that of just one year ago. Back then we were talking earnings, iPhones, and efficient frontiers. Back then we were rationalizing a 130% exposure to equities. Back then we were calculating our 4% safe withdrawal rates. Back then it was sunny skies ahead. Today our tag cloud is dark indeed. Where do we run when the dark clouds come?</p>
<p><a title="font-size: 12.5 - hits: 3" style="font-size: 12px; color: #4e54c1" href="#">Meltdown</a> <a title="font-size: 12.5 - hits: 3" style="font-size: 12px; color: #4e54c1" href="#">CreditCrisis</a> <a title="font-size: 17.5 - hits: 4" style="font-size: 17px; color: #bbcd0a" href="#">Foreclosure</a> <a title="font-size: 10 - hits: 2" style="font-size: 10px; color: #0f0505" href="#">TermAuction</a> <a title="font-size: 10 - hits: 2" style="font-size: 10px; color: #0f0505" href="#">DollarCollapse</a> <a title="font-size: 10 - hits: 2" style="font-size: 10px; color: #0f0505" href="#">AssetDevaluation</a> <a title="font-size: 30 - hits: 6" style="font-size: 30px; color: #c71105" href="#">Inflation</a> <a title="font-size: 12.5 - hits: 3" style="font-size: 12px; color: #4e54c1" href="#">Deflation</a> <a title="font-size: 17.5 - hits: 4" style="font-size: 17px; color: #bbcd0a" href="#">Stagflation</a> <a title="font-size: 30 - hits: 13" style="font-size: 30px; color: #c71105" href="#">Recession</a> <a title="font-size: 12.5 - hits: 3" style="font-size: 12px; color: #4e54c1" href="#">Depression</a> <a title="font-size: 25 - hits: 5" style="font-size: 25px; color: #ad0b92" href="#">SubPrime</a> </p>
<p>I asked at the end of last year whether it might be time to dynamically adjust our risk capacity. We had been properly focused on the long term. We understood that over any span of 20 years an investment in stocks had not just performed well but had performed pretty darn well. We understood that taking risks meant expecting returns. We understood that proper investing meant first understanding our capacity for risk and then carefully matching that risk with a portfolio of equity and fixed income index funds.</p>
<p><strong>Should We Run?<a href="http://madmoneymachine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/image3.png"><img style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px" height="161" alt="image" src="http://madmoneymachine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/image-thumb1.png" width="204" align="right" border="0" /></a> </strong></p>
<p>But late last year we saw <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cumulonimbus">cumulonimbus</a> on the radar. A monster of a stormcloud threatening to bring down home prices, their mortgage lenders, their insurers, their investors, and just about anything else in its path. Storm warnings advised those holding stocks and bonds to be prepared for tough times ahead. We did not know if the big red blob was headed our way or if it was going to veer off to the north or to the south. It was time to reassess our capacity for risk. Could we truly accept devastation in the short term? Nope. Stand here and take a pounding? Nope. It was time to turn tail and run. That meant shifting our asset allocation. But what to buy? And what to sell?</p>
<p>Ah selling. Mark Hebner of Index Funds Advisors has a saying that there are only two reasons to sell. The first is when you need the money and the second is when you lose faith in capitalism. Is it now time to sell? Do we need the money? We might argue that yeah, we need our money. Rather than losing the value of our stored wealth to someone else, wouldn&#8217;t we rather have it? So the answer to the first question then is, yes, we need our money. </p>
<p>But that is distorting words and bending them to suit our desires isn&#8217;t it? We don&#8217;t need our money in the sense that we need it to buy food. We need our money in the sense that we need it to avoiding losing it. Maybe we need a better definition of the word need. Rather than getting all Clintonian about word meanings, let&#8217;s scrap question one and instead let&#8217;s have a look at the second question; Have we lost our faith in capitalism? </p>
<p>Now we&#8217;re not asking whether we have lost our faith in God or our faith in family or our faith in the goodwill of all the great people that make up this wonderful nation in which we live. No, we are asking whether we have lost faith, even temporarily, in the privately operated market economy we call <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalism">capitalism</a>. Most importantly, we want to know if we can still make capital with our capital. In order to figure this out, we need to understand the nature of money. For some reason, they don&#8217;t teach us about money in government schools. Perhaps it is because the dumber we are about money, the more easily it can be slipped from our possession by those who might have taught us about it. </p>
<p><strong>The Meaning of Money</strong></p>
<p>I am frustrated that I didn&#8217;t know the true meaning of money until recently. Even though I took a tour of the Bureau of Engraving and Printing last year and they showed how they print Federal Reserve Notes, they didn&#8217;t explain what money is. Only by joining the <a href="http://RonPaul2008.com">r3VOLution</a> did I get my first glimpse into the true nature of money. Why didn&#8217;t somebody long ago grab me by the collar and shake me and tell me what money is? If I would have known a year ago what I know now about money I might have listened to Jim Rogers more closely and bought some commodities. I might have listened to Peter Schiff and bought some gold at $300. I might have listened to Warren Buffet and bought more foreign investments. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brazilian_real">Brazilian reals</a>. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swiss_franc">Swiss francs</a>. Even dollars &#8211; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_dollar">Australian dollars</a> that is. Folks have been trying to explain money to me for years. I did not have ears to listen. I do now.</p>
<p>I just finished reading a book published in 2006 called <em>Empire of Debt: The Rise of an <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/047198048X/104-0432013-4900737?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=madmoneymachi-20&amp;linkCode=xm2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creativeASIN=047198048X"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="137" alt="image" src="http://madmoneymachine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/image4.png" width="137" align="right" border="0" /></a> Epic Financial Crisis</em> by Bill Bonner and Addison Wiggin, they of the <a href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com/">DailyReckoning.com</a> web site. When their book was released, we were in the midst of a most glorious stock prosperity. I remember coming across the book but thinking, &quot;Why waste my time with some doom-and-gloomsters when I can be shoveling cash into the coal fire of hot stock gains?&quot; Now that I have ears to hear, I am open to the message of this book. And the message is this: The US economy is built upon a house of cards that doesn&#8217;t stop with a deck of just 52 but is expanding geometrically, piling layer upon layer, reaching far and wide, and that someday &#8211; the authors don&#8217;t know the date &#8211; we are going to be playing a game of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/52_pickup">52 Pickup</a>, but with a much larger mess on the floor.</p>
<p>The US economy, nay the economy of most of the globe, is now built upon an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="160" alt="image" src="http://madmoneymachine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/image5.png" width="244" align="right" border="0" /></a> exponentially expanding supply of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiat_currency">fiat currency</a>. Talk about a Mad Money Machine! A growing supply that is shrinking its own demand. We are aware that generally when one has more of something, that thing becomes worth less. That is indeed the nature, they tell us, of fiat currencies. And not only do they continually become worth less, but indeed they become worthless. Yes, the expected value of a fiat currency is zero. Backed by the full faith and credit. Got faith?</p>
<p>I admit I am coming to my limited understanding about all of this a bit late. When asset prices were rising day after day, who needed an understanding? Buy high and sell higher was the rule. A monkey could make money in stocks.</p>
<p>We now know that the puffy white cloud we saw miles away became a roaring thunderhead once it got on top of us. We know we gotta get to shelter. But where do we go? Over here we have the quicksand of the falling dollar. Over there we have the credit crisis. Cash is not safe; it is losing its value to inflation. Similarly, US bonds are not safe with the risk of rising interest rates. Foreign stocks are not safe; they&#8217;re coupled to the US. And now that the smart folks have figured out where to be, namely, commodities, can they be considered safe after their enormous gains recently?</p>
<p>Armed with an understanding of the impact of the glut of dollars, I cringe when I hear people talking about rising oil prices or the rising cost of commodities and how that might create inflationary pressures. Create inflationary pressures? These high prices ARE inflation. And they are not caused by growing demand. They are caused by growing supply&#8230; of dollars!</p>
<p><strong>Taxing Inflation</strong></p>
<p>And another thing&#8230; How good of the government to tax us on their own inflation! We swap out of dollars into something that holds its value, like say an American Eagle gold <a href="http://catalog.usmint.gov/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/CategoryDisplay?langId=-1&amp;storeId=10001&amp;catalogId=10001&amp;identifier=1000&amp;catType=image&amp;catLink=prodAE"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="88" alt="image" src="http://madmoneymachine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/image6.png" width="94" align="right" border="0" /></a> coin. The dollar falls and falls. Later, we swap back into dollars so that we can swap again for a car or something. But guess what? The government wants us to give them something like 30% to 40% of the difference between up there where the dollar started and down there where it ended. Don&#8217;t look at it as buying gold at $850 and then selling it at $950. Instead, consider it as swapping out of dollars at 1/850 oz. gold and swapping back in at 1/950 oz. gold. Oh yeah, and when swapping dollars for a car, they take taxes again! If we could swap directly gold for a car, perhaps we would get taxed only once?</p>
<p><strong>Where to Run?</strong>&#160;</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m looking for a place to stay dry while the storm passes, remember. Peter Schiff in <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0470043601/104-0432013-4900737?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=madmoneymachi-20&amp;linkCode=xm2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creativeASIN=0470043601"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="167" alt="image" src="http://madmoneymachine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/image7.png" width="167" align="right" border="0" /></a> <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0470043601/104-0432013-4900737?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=madmoneymachi-20&amp;linkCode=xm2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creativeASIN=0470043601">Crash Proof: How to Profit From the Coming Economic Collapse</a>&#160;</em>says buy gold, foreign assets, and keep some cash to buy the crash. James Turk in <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0385512236/104-0432013-4900737?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=madmoneymachi-20&amp;linkCode=xm2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creativeASIN=0385512236">The Coming Collapse of the Dollar and How to Profit from It</a></em> says to buy gold metal and miners, short the financials, and buy some selective exporters. Maybe it&#8217;s not a bad idea to listen to these ideas and incorporate some of them into our portfolios.</p>
<p>So how will America get out of this debt? You think there isn&#8217;t an answer don&#8217;t you? You think that we will just sink until we&#8217;re all once again living in caves. You&#8217;d be wrong. There is a way American can pay off these debts! In fact, there are three ways. Quoting now from Empire of Debt:</p>
<blockquote><p>When people cannot pay their debts, they do not pay them. But the debts do not cease to exist. They are merely &quot;paid&quot; by someone else&#8211;the creditor. In the case of America&#8217;s debts to foreign nations, this can be achieved in three ways: the currency in which the debt is denominated can be devalued against other currencies; the currency can be made less valuable through inflation; or the debt can be repudiated. One of these things&#8211;or all of them&#8211;is likely to happen.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>So there is a way to reduce if not eliminate America&#8217;s debt. Reduce the value of $9 Trillion to about $9 Million and hand over a check for the $9 Trillion. More precisely, just print $9 Trillion and pay off the debt to the foreigners with that. Never mind that by adding 9 trillion in dollars makes all of the already existing dollars worth far less. </p>
<p><strong>A Loaf of Bread for a Quarter</strong></p>
<p>We used to be able to buy a loaf of bread for a quarter. Yes, 25 cents. A quarter dollar.<img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="112" alt="image" src="http://madmoneymachine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/image8.png" width="134" align="right" border="0" /> But if hyperinflation were to happen, it could take $50 or $500 or $5000 or worse to buy a loaf of bread. But it would still take only one silver quarter. You see, a true silver quarter contains about $3.5 worth of silver at <a href="http://www.coinflation.com/silver_coin_values.html">today&#8217;s prices</a>. Even after hyperinflation where the value of the dollar drops terrifically, the silver quarter relative to the loaf of bread will stay basically the same.</p>
<p>It is hard to recommend buying silver or gold after the recent parabolic run up. Just like it was hard to buy Google at $450 the first time through that price point. I don&#8217;t know which way it will go. But this seems certain: the US dollar will get weaker. Maybe not today, maybe not next month or even the rest of 2008. But with government spending the way it is and people not saving the way they don&#8217;t, the US economy is on track for some serious <a href="http://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/meanreversion.asp">mean reversion</a> compared to the rest of the planet. Folks, we need to get really serious about preparing for some hard times. Dark clouds are here. But hey,<a href="http://madmoneymachine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/image9.png"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="120" alt="image" src="http://madmoneymachine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/image-thumb2.png" width="120" align="right" border="0" /></a> if we&#8217;re wrong and we only get peace and prosperity, if it turns out to be only a passing shower before the azure blue skies, then what have we lost? A little upside?</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s hoping that all your umbrellas are beach umbrellas and that our tag cloud for the future is full of cheery words. </p>
<p>Take the <a href="http://www.ifa.com/surveynet/">Risk Capacity Survey</a> and see where to invest now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/03/11/where-do-we-run-when-the-dark-clouds-come/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dollar to Zero? That&#8217;s Pretty Low!</title>
		<link>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/03/10/dollar-to-zero-thats-pretty-low/</link>
		<comments>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/03/10/dollar-to-zero-thats-pretty-low/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 01:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Douglas Boyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Predictions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/03/10/dollar-to-zero-thats-pretty-low/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark Faber talks about the current economy in MarketWatch: Nowhere was he bleaker than when addressing the beaten-down dollar, another victim of Fed policy which he said has ensured cash returns below the rate of inflation. &#34;In the long term, the dollar is a doomed currency. It will go to zero,&#34; he said, which produced [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark Faber <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/dr-doom-has-dollar-death/story.aspx?guid=%7BFA8E4D3A%2DFEB9%2D4ABC%2D89D0%2DA074A63DD895%7D&amp;dist=TNMostRead">talks about the current economy</a> in MarketWatch:</p>
<blockquote><p>Nowhere was he bleaker than when addressing the beaten-down dollar, another victim of Fed policy which he said has ensured cash returns below the rate of inflation. &quot;In the long term, the dollar is a doomed currency. It will go to zero,&quot; he said, which produced some nervous laughter from the audience.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m hoping there&#8217;s a touch of hyperbole in that statement. Or perhaps long term means really really long. I&#8217;m hoping. What to buy?</p>
<p>Chinese yuan. Asian property. Other Asian stuff. Other commodities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/03/10/dollar-to-zero-thats-pretty-low/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Animation of US Economy</title>
		<link>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/02/19/animation-of-us-economy/</link>
		<comments>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/02/19/animation-of-us-economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 02:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Douglas Boyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Predictions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/02/19/animation-of-us-economy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The more I read about the state of the US Economy, the more I picture something like this in my mind: Also, I get a picture in my mind of that scene in Star Wars Episode III (I think) where they crash land the spaceship and there is a lot of that &#8220;gnashing metal&#8221; sound. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://fabiusmaximus.wordpress.com/2008/01/24/geopolitical-economics/">more</a> I <a href="http://online.barrons.com/article/SB120251582071855267.html">read</a> about the <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ft/20080219/bs_ft/fto021920081334359078;_ylt=AozoX8V3CwKFRV6c_RfR1f0E1vAI">state</a> of the US Economy, the more I picture something like this in my mind:</p>
<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/PIKXzuNLiX8&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PIKXzuNLiX8&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>
<p>Also, I get a picture in my mind of that scene in Star Wars Episode III (I think) where they crash land the spaceship and there is a lot of that &#8220;gnashing metal&#8221; sound.</p>
<p>Where do we hide? They say not US stocks, not US bonds, not cash. Perhaps not even foreign stocks.<br />
Silver and Gold? China banks? Ammo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/02/19/animation-of-us-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dime is the New Penny?</title>
		<link>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/02/11/dime-is-the-new-penny/</link>
		<comments>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/02/11/dime-is-the-new-penny/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 03:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Douglas Boyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Predictions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/02/11/dime-is-the-new-penny/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The CBS show 60 Minutes did a segment about the penny. You can watch Should We Make Cents?&#160; or read the transcript. Bottom line is this: the gobmint makes $80 million worth of pennies every year. But the problem is that it costs the gobmint $134 million to make them. Not bad if you&#8217;re a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CBS show 60 Minutes did a segment about the<a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/02/07/60minutes/main3801455.shtml"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; margin: 0px 0px 0px 5px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="184" alt="image" src="http://madmoneymachine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/image4.png" width="244" align="right" border="0" /></a> penny. You can watch <em><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/02/07/60minutes/main3801455.shtml" target="_blank">Should We Make Cents?</a></em>&#160; or read the transcript. Bottom line is this: the gobmint makes $80 million worth of pennies <em>every year.</em> But the problem is that it costs the gobmint $134 million to make them. Not bad if you&#8217;re a zinc provider. Bad if you are a taxpayer. Bad for inflation. And guess what, that cost probably ain&#8217;t going to go down. Same thing with the nickel. They make $65 million worth of nickels every year. But it costs $124 million to make them.&#160; <strong>Stop the insanity! </strong>Say goodbye to the penny and nickel. How?</p>
<p>Dear friends, it is time to get rid of a decimal place. I know, I know, you love your precious two decimal places. $14.95. $19.99. Or even $1.00. Well I have a proposal that will save all us taxpayers a lot of money in zinc costs: Get rid of a decimal place! This actually works out in <em>favor</em> of the consumer because now prices would be $14.9 and $19.9 on the same items. No need to round up! Get rid of nickels and pennies. The only use for a nickel would be if you had two of them. Similarly for a penny, you could only buy something if you had ten of them. Eventually the lowest useful coin becomes the dime. And the gobmint could even fashion new dimes with Jefferson and Lincoln on them as an homage to our lost coin friends.</p>
<p>Our pockets would be lighter, our gobmint would save $113 million each and every year by not having to make these coins. That works out to be $1.3 billion after ten years&#160; and probably much more owing to the rising cost of zinc and copper (or said more properly, the lowering value of the dollar). Just think what we could do with $1.3 billion&#8230; reduce taxes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/02/11/dime-is-the-new-penny/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cramer (the Bull) vs. Santelli (the Revealer)</title>
		<link>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/01/23/cramer-the-bull-vs-santelli-the-revealer/</link>
		<comments>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/01/23/cramer-the-bull-vs-santelli-the-revealer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Douglas Boyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Predictions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/01/23/cramer-the-bull-vs-santelli-the-revealer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So Jim Cramer is saying he&#8217;s been calling for this bear market all along. This is pretty funny. Love it when he calls for DOW 14580. Be careful, Cramer is now saying NOT to buy stocks. Let&#8217;s go to the tape&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Jim Cramer is saying he&#8217;s been calling for this bear market all along. This is pretty funny. Love it when he calls for DOW 14580. Be careful, Cramer is now saying NOT to buy stocks. Let&#8217;s go to the tape&#8230; </p>
<div class="wlWriterSmartContent" id="scid:5737277B-5D6D-4f48-ABFC-DD9C333F4C5D:39349706-891f-4459-b86c-41e8783aa1cc" style="padding-right: 0px; display: inline; padding-left: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; margin: 0px; padding-top: 0px">
<div id="2763381e-fd35-48c9-beed-f9606803569f" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; display: inline;">
<div><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGkrNJ19DSU&amp;rel=1" target="_new"><img src="http://madmoneymachine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/videoe653ff66dddc.jpg" galleryimg="no" onload="var downlevelDiv = document.getElementById('2763381e-fd35-48c9-beed-f9606803569f'); downlevelDiv.innerHTML = &quot;&lt;div&gt;&lt;object width=\&quot;425\&quot; height=\&quot;355\&quot;&gt;&lt;param name=\&quot;movie\&quot; value=\&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/SGkrNJ19DSU&amp;rel=1\&quot;&gt;&lt;\/param&gt;&lt;param name=\&quot;wmode\&quot; value=\&quot;transparent\&quot;&gt;&lt;\/param&gt;&lt;embed src=\&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/SGkrNJ19DSU&amp;rel=1\&quot; type=\&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash\&quot; wmode=\&quot;transparent\&quot; width=\&quot;425\&quot; height=\&quot;355\&quot;&gt;&lt;\/embed&gt;&lt;\/object&gt;&lt;\/div&gt;&quot;;" alt=""/></a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/01/23/cramer-the-bull-vs-santelli-the-revealer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Was that a short-term bottom?</title>
		<link>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/01/22/was-that-a-short-term-bottom/</link>
		<comments>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/01/22/was-that-a-short-term-bottom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Douglas Boyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Predictions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/01/22/was-that-a-short-term-bottom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can play trader just like all the other guys. For example, here is a chart comparing the Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) in green versus the VIX, the volatility index in red (sorry color blind guys&#8230; the red is the bold line) For the past two years, when the VIX spiked, it signaled [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can play trader just like all the other guys. For example, here is a chart comparing the Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) in green versus the VIX, the volatility index in red (sorry color blind guys&#8230; the red is the bold line)</p>
<p>For the past two years, when the VIX spiked, it signaled a bottom for the VTI,&#160; which proceeded to move on upward at least for the short term. Today the VIX spiked up to 37. Did we bottom out this morning with someone selling their VTI shares at $120? (Most VTI shares traded around $129 today).</p>
<p>For a hint at the next Guru Roulette winner, I&#8217;m reading <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0470043601?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=madmoneymachi-20&amp;linkCode=xm2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creativeASIN=0470043601" target="_blank">Crash Proof</a>. It is a good summary of what I&#8217;ve learned (and passed along to you) up to this point. I wish I had read it when it first came out, it would have saved me a lot of time (and possibly a lot of money).</p>
<p> <a href="http://madmoneymachine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/image2.png"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="340" alt="image" src="http://madmoneymachine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/image-thumb2.png" width="515" border="0" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/01/22/was-that-a-short-term-bottom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Save your nickels</title>
		<link>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/01/11/save-your-nickels/</link>
		<comments>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/01/11/save-your-nickels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 02:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Douglas Boyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Predictions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/01/11/save-your-nickels/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I did show 94 and talked about saving your nickels. Then I read this.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did show 94 and talked about saving your nickels. Then I read <a href="http://www.survivalblog.com/2007/11/mass_inflation_aheadsave_your.html">this</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/01/11/save-your-nickels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>That was easy: 1 down, 9 to go</title>
		<link>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/01/02/that-was-easy-1-down-9-to-go/</link>
		<comments>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/01/02/that-was-easy-1-down-9-to-go/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 03:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Douglas Boyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Predictions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/01/02/that-was-easy-1-down-9-to-go/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On show 92, I made the prediction that commodities would be in vogue again in 2008. And I said that gold would reach new all time highs (non-inflation adjusted). That was too easy I guess. Let me revise it to say that gold will go above $1000 per ounce. Much more interesting. Nice round numbers. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On <a href="http://madmoneymachine.com/2007/12/28/mmm-092/" target="_blank">show 92</a>, I made the prediction that commodities would be in vogue again in 2008. And I said that gold would <a href="http://www.crossingwallstreet.com/archives/2008/01/gold_at_new_all.html" target="_blank">reach new all time highs</a> (<a href="https://image.minyanville.com/assets/FCK_Aug2007/File/christy/dp1.jpg" target="_blank">non-inflation adjusted</a>). That was too easy I guess. Let me revise it to say that gold will go above $1000 per ounce. Much more interesting. Nice round numbers. Everybody loves nice round numbers. While I am predicting it, I hope just as passionately that it DOES NOT HAPPEN. So what do you do? Take the <a href="http://www.ifa.com/SurveyNET/index.aspx" target="_blank">Risk Capacity Survey</a>, invest appropriately, and ignore predictions like this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/01/02/that-was-easy-1-down-9-to-go/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MMM-092: Predicting the Future</title>
		<link>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2007/12/28/mmm-092/</link>
		<comments>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2007/12/28/mmm-092/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 21:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Douglas Boyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predictions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2007/12/28/mmm-092/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rock Band. Mad Money Machine&#8217;s Ten Predictions for 2008. Step 12: Invest and Relax. A spin of the Guru Roulette wheel. If this is your first Mad Money Machine show, please do go and download another one at least. This is a year end shortened show. Next week: how the portfolios did in 2007. I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rock Band. Mad Money Machine&#8217;s Ten Predictions for 2008. Step 12: Invest and Relax. A spin of the Guru Roulette wheel. If this is your first Mad Money Machine show, please do go and download another one at least. This is a year end shortened show. Next week: how the portfolios did in 2007.</p>
<p><a href="http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=109739826" target="_blank"><img style="margin: 0px" alt="Subscribe with iTunes!" src="http://www.madmoneymachine.com/images/subscribe_with_itunes.gif" align="right"/></a></p>
<p>I ENCOURAGE you to <a href="http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=109739826">Download this show thru iTunes!</a> </p>
<p>But, if you just can’t possibly deal with that then go ahead and <br />Play the new show right now </p>
<p>
<p>The Mad Money Machine is proud to be sponsored by <a href="http://ifa.com">Index Funds Advisors at ifa.com</a>. <a href="http://madmoneymachine.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/mmm-092.jpg"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="244" alt="MMM-092" src="http://madmoneymachine.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/mmm-092-thumb.jpg" width="244" align="right" border="0"/></a> </p>
<h3><u>Topics in this week&#8217;s show include:</u></h3>
<ul>
<li>Ten predictions for 2008. Download and listen to the show for full details of each prediction</li>
</ul>
<ol>
<li>Cramer will write a new book published on Tuesday 9 December 2008 entitled <em>Jim Cramer&#8217;s Mad Rules for Investing</em> and will be about how to select index funds and ETFs, how to avoid actively managed mutual funds, and how to do other things besides watching the stock market. It will go further than his current book &#8220;Stay Mad for Life&#8221; in recommending passively managed investments, avoiding expenses and fees, and avoiding taxes. In conjunction with the book, he will begin featuring a weekly segment on his show Mad Money each Monday entitled &#8220;Index Fund of the Week&#8221; where he describes and index fund and why it is a good place to invest.&#8221;</li>
<li>Apple will release a tablet PC with a touch screen and Wi-Fi for surfing the Internet. It will have a USB port to allow connection of peripherals such as keyboard, external hard drive, camera, even external monitor. A later version will include a Bluetooth phone, connection via 3G, and an even later version will feature an extremely high resolution black and white screen mode for eBook reading giving tough competition to Amazon&#8217;s Kindle eBook reader.</li>
<li>Stock market will surprise investors. One of the recently strong segments will exhibit significant weakness in 2008. And one of the recent laggards will show significant strength. Either Fear or Greed or both will be rampant.</li>
<li>Ron Paul will do better than expected. Not hard to do when they don&#8217;t expect much at this point. Whoever bought Ron Paul futures on intrade.com for $8 will be able to sell at a nice profit.</li>
<li>Commodities will be in vogue again. You&#8217;ll be seeing a lot more of Jim Rogers. Gold will reach non-inflation adjusted record levels.</li>
<li>Ben Bernanke will resign as Fed Chairman citing a family matter instead of his actual frustration of being in a hopeless situation and not wanting to have all the blame fall upon himself.</li>
<li>Index funds will beat actively managed funds</li>
<li>A one-stop-shop ETF portfolio fund will appear that gives complete exposure to risk, reward, and diversification all for a low fee. It will include all of the SMILER components as well as some bonds, commodities, and even private equity and possibly even some selected shorts (A short of a bear fund, perhaps??)</li>
<li>MLS Soccer will continue to build. David Beckham will help score the winning goal in the MLS Cup. Other international stars will be brought into the MLS to raise awareness of this internationally popular (sans USA) sport.</li>
<li>Google will announce Google WESK: What Everyone Should Know&#8221; similar to a wikipedia but instead only includes what the sum total of the public deems to be the most important information that we all need to learn. It will have age&#8211;specific areas, topical breakdowns, and be ranked by the users and not a centralized board. You can check off the areas that you have learned and an indicator will show you your completion percentage of what you have mastered. It will be basically an FAQ for everyday life, a supplement to schools at all levels. They will also add real time stock quotes into their online spreadsheet tool.</li>
<li>Bonus: MadMoneyMachine.com podcast and blog will continue to innovate, expanding coverage into additional topics and media. Stay tuned.</li>
</ol>
<ul>
<li>Our <a href="http://MadMoneyMachine.com/gurus" target="_blank">Guru</a> this week makes bogus claims.</li>
<li>Mark Hebner explains the 12th step: Invest and Relax</li>
<li>Next week: The results from 2007</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>
<p><u>Music from music.podshow.com:</u> <br />ALTA PLAZA &#8211; XRAY DOGS <br />
Sound from the Future &#8211; <a href="http://music.podshow.com/music/producers/producerLibrary/artistdetails.php?BandHash=b334115d57a62620112c5fa376837304">Jesushairdo</a><br />
This Future &#8211; <a href="http://music.podshow.com/music/producers/producerLibrary/artistdetails.php?BandHash=827c4cc155eb8992bcc22f8d8cc77b37">emma cornwell</a><br />
Future World &#8211; <a href="http://music.podshow.com/music/producers/producerLibrary/artistdetails.php?BandHash=8030c6177b329a4efe3ec2efa345e987">Gary Hunter</a><br />
Maybe Tomorrow &#8211; <a href="http://music.podshow.com/music/producers/producerLibrary/artistdetails.php?BandHash=eb83a97fb7fb17711bb2a8ce3f595896">Secondhand</a><br />
Runaway Train &#8211; Under Feather</p>
<p><a href="skype:MadMoneyMachine?call"><img height="52" alt="Skype Me&trade;!" src="http://download.skype.com/share/skypebuttons/buttons/call_blue_white_124x52.png" width="124" align="left"/></a></p>
<p>Email me: feedback at Mad Money Machine dot com, or comment, or Call me on the Mad Money Machine voicemail line at 206-734-4763 </p>
<p><a href="skype:MadMoneyMachine?call">&nbsp;</a></p>
<p></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2007/12/28/mmm-092/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/madmoneymachine/MMM-092.mp3" length="19267197" type="audio/mpeg"/>
<itunes:duration>20:00</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>Rock Band. Mad Money Machine's Ten Predictions for 2008. Step 12: Invest and Relax. A spin of the Guru Roulette wheel. If this is your ...</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Rock Band. Mad Money Machine's Ten Predictions for 2008. Step 12: Invest and Relax. A spin of the Guru Roulette wheel. If this is your first Mad Money Machine show, please do go and download another one at least. This is a year end shortened show. Next week: how the portfolios did in 2007.
  I ENCOURAGE you to Download this show thru iTunes!  But, if you just canrsquo;t possibly deal with that then go ahead and Play the new show right now   The Mad Money Machine is proud to be sponsored by Index Funds Advisors at ifa.com.   Topics in this week's show include:  Ten predictions for 2008. Download and listen to the show for full details of each prediction  Cramer will write a new book published on Tuesday 9 December 2008 entitled Jim Cramer's Mad Rules for Investing and will be about how to select index funds and ETFs, how to avoid actively managed mutual funds, and how to do other things besides watching the stock market. It will go further than his current book "Stay Mad for Life" in recommending passively managed investments, avoiding expenses and fees, and avoiding taxes. In conjunction with the book, he will begin featuring a weekly segment on his show Mad Money each Monday entitled "Index Fund of the Week" where he describes and index fund and why it is a good place to invest." Apple will release a tablet PC with a touch screen and Wi-Fi for surfing the Internet. It will have a USB port to allow connection of peripherals such as keyboard, external hard drive, camera, even external monitor. A later version will include a Bluetooth phone, connection via 3G, and an even later version will feature an extremely high resolution black and white screen mode for eBook reading giving tough competition to Amazon's Kindle eBook reader. Stock market will surprise investors. One of the recently strong segments will exhibit significant weakness in 2008. And one of the recent laggards will show significant strength. Either Fear or Greed or both will be rampant. Ron Paul will do better than expected. Not hard to do when they don't expect much at this point. Whoever bought Ron Paul futures on intrade.com for $8 will be able to sell at a nice profit. Commodities will be in vogue again. You'll be seeing a lot more of Jim Rogers. Gold will reach non-inflation adjusted record levels. Ben Bernanke will resign as Fed Chairman citing a family matter instead of his actual frustration of being in a hopeless situation and not wanting to have all the blame fall upon himself. Index funds will beat actively managed funds A one-stop-shop ETF portfolio fund will appear that gives complete exposure to risk, reward, and diversification all for a low fee. It will include all of the SMILER components as well as some bonds, commodities, and even private equity and possibly even some selected shorts (A short of a bear fund, perhaps??) MLS Soccer will continue to build. David Beckham will help score the winning goal in the MLS Cup. Other international stars will be brought into the MLS to raise awareness of this internationally popular (sans USA) sport. Google will announce Google WESK: What Everyone Should Know" similar to a wikipedia but instead only includes what the sum total of the public deems to be the most important information that we all need to learn. It will have age--specific areas, topical breakdowns, and be ranked by the users and not a centralized board. You can check off the areas that you have learned and an indicator will show you your completion percentage of what you have mastered. It will be basically an FAQ for everyday life, a supplement to schools at all levels. They will also add real time stock quotes into their online spreadsheet tool. Bonus: MadMoneyMachine.com podcast and blog will continue to innovate, expanding coverage into additional topics and media. Stay tuned.  Our Guru this week makes bogus claims. Mark Hebner explains the 12th step: Invest and Relax Next week: The results from 2007 Music from music.podshow.com: ALTA PLAZ...</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Podcasts,,Predictions</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Paul Boyer, MadMoneyMachine.com</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

