<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MMM-096: Bear Market Medley</title>
	<atom:link href="http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/01/25/mmm-096/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/01/25/mmm-096/</link>
	<description>BEST BUSINESS PODCAST NOMINEE 2006 and 2007. Paul Douglas Boyer takes on Wall Street with complete laziness and reviews the Mad Money recommendations of Jim Cramer. Plus: Money-making idea segments like Guru Roulette, Tools in the Crib, and Portfolio Smackdown. Subscribe to get the lastest episodes! More info at MadMoneyMachine.com.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 20:44:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Douglas Boyer</title>
		<link>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/01/25/mmm-096/comment-page-1/#comment-22871</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Douglas Boyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/01/25/mmm-096/#comment-22871</guid>
		<description>You are correct to point that out. Buying and holding the S&amp;P 500 could be a great portion of one&#039;s portfolio, but as I said, if that is one&#039;s primary investment then one is not adequately diversified. Admittedly a tangential relationship to active investing (not active trading) in that one is &quot;picking&quot; the US Large Cap sector to be the best performer versus a larger investment in the whole world and in more heavily weighting small value stocks. Thanks for the comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are correct to point that out. Buying and holding the S&#038;P 500 could be a great portion of one&#8217;s portfolio, but as I said, if that is one&#8217;s primary investment then one is not adequately diversified. Admittedly a tangential relationship to active investing (not active trading) in that one is &#8220;picking&#8221; the US Large Cap sector to be the best performer versus a larger investment in the whole world and in more heavily weighting small value stocks. Thanks for the comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ReadBuySleep</title>
		<link>http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/01/25/mmm-096/comment-page-1/#comment-22860</link>
		<dc:creator>ReadBuySleep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MadMoneyMachine.com/2008/01/25/mmm-096/#comment-22860</guid>
		<description>Hi Paul, great show as usual. One question: You say in this episode:

&quot;Are you primarily invested in S&amp;P 500 thinking this provides adequate diversification? [...] Then you&#039;re an active investor&quot;

Isn&#039;t this the strategy that launched passive investing, with the 1976 launch of the Vanguard S&amp;P 500 index fund?  I guess, you could say that you could diversify some more, but is it really Active Trading?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paul, great show as usual. One question: You say in this episode:</p>
<p>&#8220;Are you primarily invested in S&amp;P 500 thinking this provides adequate diversification? [...] Then you&#8217;re an active investor&#8221;</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t this the strategy that launched passive investing, with the 1976 launch of the Vanguard S&amp;P 500 index fund?  I guess, you could say that you could diversify some more, but is it really Active Trading?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
